home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: piglet.cc.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
- From: victor@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Vic Menayang)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: UART 16650
- Date: 24 Feb 1996 02:07:49 -0600
- Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
- Message-ID: <4gmh0l$2gi@piglet.cc.utexas.edu>
- References: <31214F47.1FFC@ozemail.com.au> <4fsr22$4o1@centurio.m30x.nbg.scn.de> <4gf6b3$v5d@mips.pfalz.de> <4gkaj5$i5f@hg.oro.net>
- Reply-To: victor@mail.utexas.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: piglet.cc.utexas.edu
-
- In article <4gkaj5$i5f@hg.oro.net>, Ed Starry <estarry@oro.net> wrote:
- :
- : These large FIFO buffer sizes and we still have to suffer with everyone
- :using an 8250 for uploading. Who cares how big a Rx Buffer is if no one will
- :use these big FIFO buffers to Tx/Upload with!
-
- Care to elaborate what you mean by the above statement?
-
-
-
-